Would you use a Manuverable motor cycle or a car?

Personally, I would use a car because I'm not familiar with driving a motorcycle. If I learn in the future, that will likely change. However, if you're asking what the better option is between the two, I'd say motorcycle for those who know how to operate them. Better maneuverability, gas mileage, etc. than most cars. However, it also depends on your situation. Naturally you won't want to traverse a road covered in ice and snow with a motorcycle, you'd be far better off with a 4 wheel drive vehicle in that instance.

Would anyone take a pickup truck with morocycles strapped to the back?

i would not want either i would rather have a horse. it maybe alot slower than a car or motorcycle but it does not need gas or tires and it is a lot more agile than a car or motorcycle.

Horses still require fuel in the form of food, water, and shelter. Not to mention even the best trained horses are likely to spook in apocalyptic situations.

motorcycle with chainsaws strapped to it

motorcycle with chainsaws strapped to it

Wow.

I own a Honda100ccmy sister owns a yamaha 50cc my dad a freggin hudge KTM annd my mom has a honda scooter. With most dirtbikes you get about 50 miles to the gallon and are for the most part inndestructable if you take care of it. And for the mostpart thier pretty safe. My father flipped the damn bike down a creek. so yes.

Well, i would have to learn how to ride a motorcycle, so ii pretty much am going to stick with the car, and if you have the motorcycle and run into a group of zombies and wreck, well then you are pretty much screwed

What about those motorcycles with three wheels

i would have a 4x4 truck, with a plow in the front, and a motorcycle in the back

I would take a truck with 4x4 and a good mpg ratio with a big fuel tank, and on the back i would have the three wheels on it, with extra fuel.

Motorcycle because if you ever run into a bunch of cars on the road the you can manuver around them when if u have a car then you stuck with walking.

I own a 100cc Honda dirt bike, it gets 80 miles to the gallon and runs on regular unleaded gasoline. I have abused the thing so much and it still runs like a dream. Its farely lightweight and if your wearing the gear (which makes you look like a frigging power ranger) you can survive a wreck a 60mph. It dosent offer much cargo space but a MOLLY pack will carry most of your stuff. I also took out the inner tube in the tire and replaced it with a foam tube that cant go flat. My choice Motorcycle.

I use a car for one simple reason, and that is that it provides a person with "some" protection from zombies and the elements.   Expecially if you have to travel at night.  

You can also carry more members of your team, and or supplies in a car.  

But if your in the car and come to a pile up of banged up and crashed cars what would you do if you cant drive by them.

Most cars will handle some off road travel.   My personal vehicle (Ford F350 4x4) would easily go off road.    Or just go around.   It will be a small inconvienience, but the safty and shelter in my opinion would out weigh any problem.

I gusse your right and motor. are loud

“A motorcycle or a car”

Perceptibly this question triggers an enormous curiosity of existence or demise, which better suits the survivor(s)? I believe that the answer lies within a heap of behaviors that the person(s) would find more effective in their own attitude.

Yes I will give the automobile (car) a good assessment of security to any user who can comprehend the components of the vehicle and road itself. The car also brings more than just safety but a wide assortment of car paraphernalia, GPS, radio, etc. Having more space means having more equipment or people that heightens the efficiency of any survivor or group. Modifying a car could also be an advantage but this would only be possible if you had a skilled hand at crafting metal and  gear needed to complete a task not including how heavily infested the area or nation is.

 A motorcycle in my opinion is the faster and more compact out of the two it gives speed and movement an immense enhancement of transportability depending weather conditions. Thee bike can accelerate fast and get the user out of hairy situation if needed and can maneuver around corners more precisely than virtually any car could. But assessment of safety is very low in fact critical! If the rider(s) were to fall, crash, spinout etc. the user would most likely die because the high presser impact if not killed through the collision they would face a horrible fate if badly injured during the wipeout. Theses of Crouse are the cons not the pros. So what are pros? Easy the speed and maneuverability is a much welcomed guess if used wisely with deep and well thought preparations.

 

Well, please let me add this...a horse+spook=loud noises which then = zombies attracted to sound and you have to run and leave it behind. Then, my answer would be both. I'm with Hunter because I can have a truck carrying my bike, so when one goes wrong I have the other. But...if I had to absolutely choose, it would be (and I'm sure you guys have somthing to say on this), a Suzuki V-Strom 1000. Because it's a dual sport bike which means it's good for both off road terrain and on road. I plan to have this bike in the near future.